The story begins in 1983 when Paul Anka and Michael Jackson (then at the height of his stardom) co-wrote a song intended to appear on a duets album that Paul was recording. Shortly after the song was completed, MJ pulled away from the project and took the recordings.
In 1991, R&B singer Safire recorded a version of the song titled, "I Never Heard." That recording gave writing credits to both MJ and Paul Anka. On Sunday, almost twenty years after "I Never Heard", the Jackson estate released "This is It." Many people in the music industry immediately recognized the similarities between the two songs. The problem was that Paul Anka did not receive a writing credit for "This is It."
Prepared to take the case to court, Paul Anka and the Jackson estate have agreed to terms and Paul Anka has now received his deserved writing credit.
This song shows the need for song writers and collaborators to protect their rights. This song took several variations over three decades and nearly led to a lawsuit. I wonder if the this would have settled so easily had the co-writer been an unknown artist without a legal team behind him or her, as opposed to a legend like Paul Anka.
Three current judges: Judge Savage and Judge Indeglia of the Superior Court, and Judge D'Ambra of the Family Court will be interviewed. In addition, three private attorneys, John A. MacFadyen, Samuel Zurier, and Sandra Lanni will be considered.
A doctor can legally prescribe a medicine to treat an illness even if that medicine is not approved for that purpose. This is a so-called off-label use. While this practice is legal, drug companies are not allowed to "push" off-label uses to doctors.
Drug companies, obviously find this unfair. They argue, that if a drug works to treat an illness they should be able to promote it even before they have proceeded through the countless clinical trials needed in order to gain approval from the FDA. The basis of their argument - Free speech!
Allergan's complaint claims the FDA "has promulgated a series of overlapping and interlocking regulations that combine to render unlawful virtually all manufacturer communication, through any avenue, to any audience, about the lawful off-label use of a prescription drug." Furthermore, "the inability to share such important information proactively with the medical community violates the First Amendment and potentially diminishes the quality of patient care."
I think the First Amendment argument is a novel approach. The Courts, however, have often limited free speech if necessary for the greater good. One could argue that the FDA is already hopeless in combatting the power of drug companies, and this lawsuit is an attempt to cripple the FDA which serves an important and valid purpose for the general public.
A victory for Allergan clearly creates a slippery slope for drug manufacturers who will be able to enter a product into the market for one purpose and then promote it for countless others without the safeguards created by the FDA.
The answer is a mechanical license. These licenses are paid and distributed to the artists who own the intellectual property that you are covering. This is the only legal way to record and distribute material that is owned by another artist or musician. So, if your band is planning on covering the The Clash for your demo or CD, be sure that you are not setting yourself up for a lawsuit.
Many retailers, both in store and on-line, will refuse to carry music if they believe the necessary licenses are missing. This is because they open themselves up to a lawsuit for selling bootlegged music. The license fees are relatively low and well worth the expense to avoid a lawsuit.
My office can help you obtain the necessary licenses so that you can sell your music with confidence and get your independent CD into the stores. Call for a free consultation today.
I would be quite astonished if this was the first time the bar was sued for such an event. The situation does present interesting liability questions. According to the plaintiff, she was encouraged to climb on to the bar by employees of the club. She claims to have fallen because the bar top was slippery with drinks. So it sounds like a great liability claim until we consider that she is a college student in a bar. I'm going to guess that defense will argue she was bombed. Then again, all the more reason for the employees to keep her from dancing on the bar.
Here's wishing her a quick recovery.
The direct costs of malpractice lawsuits -- jury awards, settlements and the like -- are such a minuscule part of health spending that they barely merit discussion...
...All told, jury awards, settlements and administrative costs -- which, by definition, are similar to the combined cost of insurance -- add up to less than $10 billion a year. This equals less than one-half of a percentage point of medical spending.
I have made the point in previous posts, that very few medical malpractice cases are accepted by attorneys and/or go to trial. The high cost of a lawsuit and the difficulty in proving medical malpractice prohibits excessive lawsuits. Mr. Leonhardt supports my opinion:
After reviewing thousands of patient records, medical researchers have estimated that only 2 to 3 percent of cases of medical negligence lead to a malpractice claim.
Contrary to the perception of some, we do not have a court system backlogged with frivilous medical malpractice lawsuits which are causing the death of our health care system. The number of cases and costs attributed to medical malpractice litigation is astonishingly low in comparison to the total cost of our health care system.
Mr. Leonhardt does criticize the current system by pointing out that fear of malpractice leads to defensive medicine which is often wasteful. Unfortunately, there is no solution to combatting defensive medicine. States that have medical malpractice caps, or other legislation meant to curb litigation, often have similar amounts of spending. One reason could be that doctors are paid more for doing more, and the excess testing and treatment is as much financial opportunism as it is defensive medicine.
Best of luck.
No illnesses have been reported to date. Kilwin's is a Michigan candy retailer with stores in several States. The Rhode Island franchise is located in Newport. If you or a loved one has been injured because of this product, contact our office for a free consultation.
Today it appears that the Ellen DeGeneres Show is going to be sued for illegally broadcasting music. It appears that those quirky trademark dances that Ellen performs which some people, not including this author, find funny, have been performed over music that was not properly licensed. That's right - a national television show broadcast to millions apparently forgot to obtain licenses and permission to broadcast music.
When asked why they did not obtain the proper licenses, one of the show's producers allegedly replied we don't "roll that way." That at least is kind of funny. Ellen herself was not listed as a defendant in the suit.
By registering your copyright with the United States Copyright Office:
- You are making clear when your work was created;
- You are telling the world that this idea, song, image is your creation;
- You gain valuable legal protections in the courtroom that may be absent without a registered copyright;
- You are ensured that the Courts will hear your case;
- You will not have any difficulty presenting evidence as to when your work was created.
A lot of musicians ask me about the so-called "poor man's copyright" in which the author of a work mails the work to himself in a sealed envelope to prove the time of creation. While there is some merit to this process, there are cases in which the material was not allowed into evidence for one reason or another. Instantly, the author's entire case was lost. In some circumstances, registration is necessary in order to bring the suit (in other words, if you don't hold a registered copyright, the courts won't even hear your case). As such, I would not recommend that any serious musician rely on the "poor man's copyright."
In the age of the internet where a song can be heard and stolen from 3000 miles away, it is imperative that musicians protect their work. There are two examples of copyright infringement that all musicians want to prevent. The first is illegal downloading and possession of your material. The second example is where someone hears your song, lyrics, or melody and "incorporates" it into his or her "creation."
Federal registration of a copyright is the only way to ensure your protection. It is both easy and inexpensive. Rest easy knowing that your work is fully protected and concentrate on what you do best - creating music.
Call my office for a free consultation and we can discuss your options concerning copyright and trademark.
The settlement brings an end to numerous civil and criminal filings against Pfizer and subsidiary, Upjohn, regarding the painkiller Bextra which was pulled from the market in 2005, as well as a few other drugs. As part of the settlement, the corporation will plead guilty to misbranding Bextra with the intent to defraud.
The Dept. of Justice initially brought the charges alleging that Pfizer promoted Bextra for off-label uses that were not approved by the FDA. The Department also alleged that Pfizer gave kickbacks to doctors to encourage them to prescribe Bextra (a charge that Pfizer still denies).
I'd like to believe such settlements will cause drug companies to re-think the way they rush drugs to the market and promote them to the public, but alas, much like the tobacco companies, such settlements are a small drop in the ocean. I wouldn't be surprised if Pfizer still made a profit on Bextra despite the settlement.
Unfortunately, around 3,000 cyclists are killed each year across the country. Both drivers of cars and motorcyclists need to help bring down this staggering number. Drivers of cars are unaccustomed to looking for motorcycles or bicyclists. Often while looking for other vehicles to avoid, a driver's eye can miss a motorcyle or bike. Unfortunately, a relatively minor car accident can result in a fatal motorcycle accident.
I am an avid bicyclist myself and know the unique hazards that motorcycle and bicycle riders face. It is always on us to drive defensively when the rest of the world is innattentive. If you have been injured while riding a motorcycle, it is important to call an attorney who understands this difference and has experience representing bikers.